Re: dhuga:ter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Miguel Carrasquer Vidal" <miguelc@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter


> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:39:20 -0500, "Patrick Ryan"
> <proto-language@...> wrote:
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Miguel Carrasquer Vidal" <miguelc@...>
> >To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 2:31 AM
> >Subject: Re: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:00:00 -0500, "Patrick Ryan"
> >> <proto-language@...> wrote:

<snip>

> >> >Secondly, the theorized hardening apparently occurs with all
> >> >'laryngeals',
> >> >suggesting a phonological identity that would make variegated
> >> >responses
> >> >to
> >> >them by adjacent vowels problematical.
> >
> >***
> >
> >You did not address this. I would be interested in your thoughts.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Once the
> three laryngeals have coloured the vowels, they're free to
> merge. Once they've lengthened the vowels, they're free to
> vanish.

***

I mean it is easier to understand [G] or [x] hardening to [k] than [?].

Also, are you going to be able to give me the actual Latin accusative and
nominative plural of <senex>?


Patrick

***




> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> miguelc@...
>
>