From: Rick McCallister
Message: 55441
Date: 2008-03-18
> At 9:56:03 PM on Monday, March 17, 2008, Patrick____________________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan wrote:
>
> > But Brian, ask yourself if it does not mean
> 'animal teat',
> > why it is "contemptuous".
>
> As I said: that's a relatively recent development.
> The word
> appears originally to have been neutral. This sort
> of
> pejoration is hardly an uncommon phenomenon.
>
> > 'snout' for 'mouth', 'paws' for 'hands': it is a
> pretty
> > general pattern.
>
> Which does not appear to be in evidence here. Look
> at the
> data instead of your preconceptions.
>
> Brian
>
>
>