--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:
Penult accent hardly
occurs in underived stems, though many inherently accented
derivational suffixes can
yield stems with penult accent. For example, nonderived words with
penult accent,
such as a hypothetical *pel¢¥eku-s, do not occur, although there are
many derived words
with penult accent, such as anthroop-¢¥©¥sk-o-s ‚njrwp¨¢skoc ¡®little
person¡¯.4 Once morphology
is taken into account, stems can be divided into accented and
unaccented
stems, the former with a lexically associated stem-final accent, the
latter with recessive
accent. Both are preserved as far as the undominated constraints on
accent and
intonation permit.> I cannot lose my time to explain you more than I
did => your answer
> show again that you are faraway to understand the Greek accentuation
> I) Regarding Greek forms: the .pdf that I sent you resume all
> your 'cases' -> you need to read it
> You even don't know what is the domain of applicability of this
rule
>
>
I made a copy/paste for some of your questions "why one like this and
why the other like that"?
"
Penult accent hardly
occurs in underived stems, though many inherently accented
derivational suffixes can
yield stems with penult accent. For example, nonderived words with
penult accent,
such as a hypothetical *pel¢¥eku-s, do not occur, although there are
many derived words
with penult accent, such as anthroop-¢¥©¥sk-o-s ¡®little person¡¯.
4 Once morphology
is taken into account, stems can be divided into accented and
unaccented
stems, the former with a lexically associated stem-final accent, the
latter with recessive
accent. Both are preserved as far as the undominated constraints on
accent and
intonation permit.
"
But finally if you want to learn you can really read it....
Marius