Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 55411
Date: 2008-03-17

A 'dug' is an _animal_ teat, Rick.

Human 'teats' come from a different root: *dhe:(h)(i)-

As for *bhra:(H)ter-, 'being born' is not a habitual activity.


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rick McCallister
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too
>
>
> because the word basically mean "female" --i.e. "one
> who gives suck"
> I think Watkins explains that --and doesn't female
> come from the same root?
> Now that we have fathers and daughters --what is the
> meaning of the root of brother?
>
> =========
>
> (Young) daughters precisely are not women
> and even less child-bearing mothers.
> so your explanation falls outside the target.
>
> Brother *bhreH2-ter looks like
> born child : bh_r + H2_t + er
> Maybe just a coincidence.
>
> Arnaud
> =============
>
>
>
>
>
>