Re: Re[2]: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 55332
Date: 2008-03-16

----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal

What Olsen says is that there is no instrumental suffix
*-dhro-, just like there are no agent nouns in
*-dhor-/*-dhér-. What has been mistaken for *-dhró- is in
fact *-thró-, from *-h1/2-tró-.

========

This is an interesting simplification.

But
it's not proved yet.

Arnaud

================

Previous in thread: 55331
Next in thread: 55333
Previous message: 55331
Next message: 55333

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts