From: tgpedersen
Message: 55250
Date: 2008-03-15
>Not that I can see, unless he thinks of the Elbe Germanic area minus
> Another perspectived below.
> --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> > Rolf Hachmann
> > Germanen und Kelten am Rhein in der Zeit um Christi
> > Geburt
> > pp. 54-56
> > translation
> >
> >
> > "
> > WRITTEN EVIDENCE AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDS
> > In the first century CE the settlement area of the Suebian cult
> > community stretches from the lower Elbe in the North, the abodes
> > of the Langobardi, to the area of the Danube tributaries March,
> > Waag and Eipel in the South, the abodes of the Quadi.
> > Archaeologically this area forms a relatively closed unity,
> > discernible by many types of characteristics of the grave custom,
> > recognizable also in the material culture. The old opinion that
> > this so-called "Elbe Germanic" culture of the transitional period
> > and the first century CE is Suebian, may thus be confirmed in its
> > full extent. Already in the last century BCE these groups can be
> > clearly detected in a much smaller area,
>
> ****GK: Does Hachmann say what this "smaller area" is?****
> > and for those areas they acquired in the meantime is according...
> > to literary evidence the immigration of Suebian tribes. The
> > Marcomanni, who Livius still in the time of Drusus knows as
> > eastern neighbors of the Chatti (Orosius VI, 21; Florus II 30),
> > appear in Bohemia (Vellejus Pat. II 108; Tacitus, Germ. 42), the
> > Suebian Quadi spread out in Moravia and the Western Slovakia
> > (Tacitus, Germ. 42; Ann. II 63) ...
> >
> ****GK: Would it be possible, to some extent, toWell, I still say 'confederation'.
> effect a reconciliation of Tacitus, Caesar, and
> Hachmann?
> Acc. to Tacitus (Germania, 39) the "oldestI've seen somewhere on minor sites on the net that the Elbe Germanic
> and most famous" of the Suebi are the Semnones, and
> the center of the Suebian religious cult is on their
> territory. If this territory (somewhere between the
> Elbe and the Oder) could be equated with Hachmann's
> "small area" for the beginning of his "Elbe Germanic"
> culture and cult, we would have a connection.
> The connection with Caesar would be Tacitus' statementThe idea that he was a Suebian is from Pliny, not Caesar. I think that
> that the "districts they [the Semnones GK] inhabit
> number a hundred, and their multitude makes them
> believe that they are the principal people of the
> Suebi."(ibid.) Compare this to Caesar's statement
> about the "100 cantons" of the Suebi (in two places
> of DBG). In this perspective, the migrating
> Przeworkers might simply be associates of the Suebi,
> and their abandoned lands would constitute the
> wasteland Caesar refers to. The dominance of the
> Semnones might also explain the eventual success and
> spread of the Elbe Germanic culture and ritual, and
> the cultural assimilation of many Yastorfers and
> Przeworkers. Would Ariovistus then have been a
> Semnonic leader?====
> There is however one differenceConfederation ;-)
> between Hachmann and Tacitus which can't apparently be
> bridged. Tacitus includes the Goths and Vandals (or
> Lugii etc..)and others among his Suebians. Hachmann
> does not include the later Przeworsk or Wielbark etc..
> in his Elbe Germanic cult/cultural "Suebian"
> community.****