Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Piotr Gasiorowski
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:06 AM
> Subject: [Courrier indsirable] Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too
>
>
> On 2008-03-13 23:33, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal wrote:
>

<snip>

> ========
>
> Latin su:bula "awl" is from *s_z_w

***

In what language? Either specify little things like or do not bother to
mention them. They are meaningless in no context.

***

> as seen in Egyptian s_z_b "to sew"
> Coptic me-sôbe "awl"

***

There is _NO_ Egyptian <szb>, 'sew', AFAIK.

Where did you get this?

***


> The presence of *z accounts for
> the "strange" of this root *s(y)ew
> with (East) or without (West) *y < z.
>
> Su:--bula can be from *so:-- < *sozw--
> There is no restauration here.

***

The difference between *syew- and *sew- is that simply some PIE-derived
languages used derivational *sA-y as a base while some used simply *sA

or

All were original *sAy-based and *syAw- was simplified to *sAw- in some
PIE-derived languages; I favor this explanation though there is no 'proving
it'.


Patrick

***

<snip>