Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2008-03-13 02:09, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > Olsen derived Latin acerbus as *h2ek^-ri-h2-to => so you can be sure
> > now that she consider the metathesis h-t > t-h available for any h-
> > (to suppose in general h-t > t-h is for sure coherent)
>
> Just for the record: she proposes PIE preaspiration > aspiration

after

> the consonantal allophones of the voiceless laryngeals *h1 and *h2,

but

> specifically not after *h3.
>
> Piotr

1) first I doubt regarding the idea to put h3 outside from h1 and h2 =>
this supposed 'a well known nature of PIE-s h1, h2, h3" => that for
sure is not the case today => so I didn't trust too much a h-t- > t-h
metathesis that happens for h1,h2 but not for h3 etc...


2) Anyway: you can check and see that my examples were limited to h1
and h2 and in addition I quoted exactly she's own derivations (not to
work with examples that she didn't give)
But 'Just for the record:' barba:tus (with t- (sic!)) has an h2
inside, isn't it? and is quite an old word viewing its Balto-Slavic
cognates.

Marius