Re: Post-Postscript on Przeworsk

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:42:14 +0100, "fournet.arnaud"
<fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>>Bomhard: Indo-European and the Nostratic hypothesis
>>"
>>344.
>>PN *k'wad-/*k'w&d- "to form, to fashion, to build" >
>>PK *k'wed- "to build", *k'wedel- "wall";
>>PAA *k'wad-/*k'w&d- "to form, to fashion, to build";
>>PD *kut.i "house, hut, abode"
>>
>>Est. kodu, - "home"
>>
>>Cf. German Kotte, Eng cot, cottage
>>
>>which could also be reconstructed from this word family.
>>===========
>
>Klimov reconstructs PGZ *k.(e)d-el- "wall". Svan c^.wed-
>with the same meaning shows an irregular correspondence k.-
>~ c^.w-.
>
>======
>It's also interesting to look at Starostin
>He has two different reconstructions.

Starostin has *k.ad- "to build", basically the same as
Klimov's *k.ed-/*k.d- "to build" (on Laz k.id- ~ k.od-,
Klimov remarks that "the last form must point to a parallel
vocalism *a").

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
miguelc@...