Re: Laryngeal Reduction - Rule-1: -CHCC- > -CCC-

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud"
<fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: alexandru_mg3
> > ===============
> >
> > I don't think this example proves the supposed rule.
> >
> > Hebrew d_b_r "to speak"
> > is the same thing as PIE *wer "speak"
> > with inverted order of morphemes.
> > No traces of H1.
> > This is a case of alternation
> > *wer-H1 versus *wer-dh.
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > ==================
>
> Same case as in *bHoi-h- /*bHoi-dH- isn't it?
>
> Marius
>
> ===============
> Why not ?
>
> Do you have data to support
> either *bheidh-om or *bhidh-om ?
>
> Like in LAtin v(e)rbum ?
>
> Arnaud
>
> ================

Arnaud, the root is *bHehi/*bHeih- with laryngeal

the extension is -dHh1- nill-grade of dHeh1

Marius