From: george knysh
Message: 55009
Date: 2008-03-11
>****GK: What was the difference between "the Germanic
> > > > >
> > > > > There was the east-west trek, under
> whichever
> > > > > leaders.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Torsten
> > > >
> > > > GK: Are you still maintaining that:
> > > >
> > > > (1) "Germanic proper... developed from
> Przeworsk"
> > > > (2) "Przeworsk became the center of the
> Germanic languages
> > > > in our perspective."
> > > > (3) "the Grimm-shift took place during
> Przeworsk expansion
> > > > into Germania" ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, on all three counts.
> > >
> > >
> > > Torsten
> >
> > GK: Fine. Then explain why
> >
> > (1) Jastorf+Silesian Celts+Bornholm and other
> > islanders+ Pomeranians (=Przeworsk) creates
> > "Germanic",
> The Germanic language family, that is.
>
> >WHILE
> > (2) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Scandinavians (=Oksywie)
> > DOES NOT, and
> Para-Germanic?
> >****GK: Fine. Which component was favoured among the 4
> > (3) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Milohrad c.+ Scythian
> > Thrakoids (=Zarubintsi) DOES NOT, and
> >
> > (4) Jastorf+ Pomeranians + Geto/Dacian c. (=
> > Poeneshti-Lukashovka) DOES NOT.
> >
> > ****
>
> That's not really a problem.
> Some ex-British colonies speak English, some don't.
> Some ex-Roman colonies speak Romance, some don't.
> If several heterogenous components come together
> linguistically, the
> end result is that one of the components is favored,
> depending on
> extra-linguistic circumstances.