From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 54616
Date: 2008-03-04
> No. The fact remains that the circumflex in Lithuanian isHe didn't. See Dersken on Leiden: *bHoih-d(H)h1-
> incompatible with the acute in Latvian. Derksen sees the
> acute in Latvian as secondary, but he apparently departs
> from a root *bhoi-dhh1- without laryngeal