Re: Can new Algor i thms reveal the

As I recall, many people rejected Ringe's tree-model
--including Trask. Big deal.

--- mkelkar2003 <swatimkelkar@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Richard
> Wordingham" <richard@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud"
> <fournet.arnaud@>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Mayuresh Kelkar drew our attention to:
> > http://www.hjholm.de/Holm%20Arbo%20old.pdf
> >
> > One of its figures is the following map:
> >
> > > The map is interesting :
> > >
> > > http://www.hjholm.de/SLRD-map.jpg
> > >
> > > You shot in your foot.
> >
> > No he didn't. Hans Holm's paper says that the
> history depicted there
> > was not proven. Mayursh was principally sharing
> some graphics with
> > us, not trying to make a point.
>
>
> Holmes rejects or severly critizes the quantitative
> methods used by
> Gray, McMahon, Ringe in the "Arboreteum" paper. His
> on SLR method does
> not produce the first branch as Anatolian. The map
> shown below
>
> http://www.hjholm.de/SLRD-map.jpg
>
> is based on that premise. Here is the problem. The
> earliest
> branching of Anatolian is I think unversally agreed
> upon by IEL. How
> important is this to maintain a norhtern Caspian
> scenerio?
>
> M. Kelkar
> >
> > Richard.
> >
>
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs