> This is a linguistic list. It is rooted in linguistic
> inquiry and information. If that's offends you, you
> should leave the list. Linguistic inquiry does not
> involve sacred texts which are never wrong interpreted
> by true believers who are always right.
That is not my position. Rig Veda is a sacred text to me. But it does
not support either the OIT or the AIT. I have no intention of leaving
this list. A trained Indo-European linguist H. H. Hock has been quoted
as saying that PIE could have been aprori be spoken in India.
M. Kelkar
==========
Hock wrote a book of Historical linguistics
where he explains that Satem first happened
in Indo-Iranian then spreads to BaltoSlavic.
I don't think he could possibly have either said or written
such nonsense.
Arnaud
==================