Re: [Courrier indésirable] Re: Re: [tied] Nubia (WAS- Re: Limitatio

> ============
> tsalam? t?ob
>
> According to Loprieno's reconstructions,
> Coptic : <noub> or <nouf> to be read [nuw]
> Egyptian skeleton : n_b_w
> Reconstruction : na:baw
> Later on : [nu:b > nuw]
>
> I have no idea if we have the right to connect Nubia with n_b_w.
>
> Arnaud

***
I believe the skeleton is n-w-b,
Patrick

***
Everybody is entitled to believe what he or she wants to,

in the particular case of n_b_w,
the root is not n_w_b,

and the rest follows from that first truth.

Arnaud
==================