Re: PIE-Arabic Correspondences (was Brugmann's Law)

----- Original Message -----

From: fournet.arnaud

To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 8:14 AM

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Re: PIE-Arabic Correspondences (was Brugmann's Law)

 

***

 

If you do not know what the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago is, it is hard to see how you can legitimately join a discussion involving hieroglyphic Egyptian.

Again, you distort my views.

 

I never said there was no connection between z3, 'son', and Si-Nuhe. On the contrary, I mentioned that cuneiform recorded the pronunciation of /si/ for z3.

 

I would ask that you try to address my views rather than invent them.

 

 

Patrick

 

***

Coptic is important. I studied Coptic at the Oriental Institute.

********

 

Q1 : sorry, but what is this "Oriental Institute" ?

 

Q2 : you studied Coptic and

you can't see the connections between

Z_R and Si-nouhe !?

Strange !?

 

Arnaud

============ =====