From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 51589
Date: 2008-01-20
----- Original Message -----From: tgpedersenSent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 6:43 AMSubject: [Courrier indésirable] [tied] Re: Bird (was: Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian)
> ============ =
> I have made the hypothesis that PIE had a nasal prefix,
> most probably #m- (as in PAA) (unprovable because of assimilation)
> this could be the explanation.
What semantics would it have? Semantics-less morphemes are suspect.========
The same as in Semitic : agent or place or instrument.
Morphemes not always have "good" clear-cut semantics.
A certain number of French words display a strange #ca- as first syllable
and it very hard to understand what this #ca- stands for :
It has only a vague derogatory connotation.
Arnaud
==================
> In that case bridd could be good Germanic out of *m-pet-ro >
> *bhedhro.
What's with the t > dh?===============
What about mo-dh-er and fa-th-er ?
================
And how would you explain the /k/ of th Du.,
Ger. words?========
I missed these words with -k- !?
What were they ?
===============