Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Brugmann's Law

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 51582
Date: 2008-01-20

Latin initial bh > f
LAtin non initial bh > b
 
ex : rabh- > rabidus
 
Arnaud
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Rick McCallister
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Brugmann's Law

Good question. If it's a native word, would it be bh?

--- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@ wanadoo.fr>
wrote:

> is labor from *l_b or *l_bh ?
>
> Arnaud
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian M. Scott
> To: fournet.arnaud
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:51 PM
> Subject: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Brugmann's Law
>
>
> At 3:56:48 AM on Saturday, January 19, 2008,
> fournet.arnaud
> wrote:
>
> > From: Rick McCallister
>
> >> It makes sense given the relationshion between
> for words
> >> for orphan and slave.
>
> > What is this relationship supposed to be ?
>
> <http://www.bartleby .com/61/roots/ IE363.html>
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile. yahoo.com/ ;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR 8HDtDypao8Wcj9tA cJ