Re: IE & Uralic

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tolgs001" <george_st@...> wrote:

>
> >Can't you see that -g- in moger is the best match for -dzh- in latin
> >script?
>
> I don't know for what -g- stoodin those Latin chronicles. I'm no

expert

> in old Hungarian. But I can add that in some (sub-)dialects of modern
> Hungarian, the pan-Hungarian <gy>, which stands for a

palatalized /g/,

> is rendered as a <dz^> /dZ/ (that warrants an English rendering
> "Madjar").

If I remember right there's a mention of m.k.ri (Mogeri?) by Eldad ha-
Dani or in Sepher Yosippon. If that be true, where's the "dzh"?