From: Rick McCallister
Message: 51248
Date: 2008-01-14
>__________________________________________________________
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: george knysh
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:27 AM
> Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: [tied]
> Etruscans
>
>
>
> ****GK: If you cited Marx in this fashion you
> would
> make him a rabid capitalist. If you cited Hitler
> in
> this way he would be a liberal. It's a good idea
> to
> read the whole before reacting.****
>
> ========
> Arnaud
> I read this article :
> it states that because Etruscan **real** remnants
> cannot be used, they used genes from nowadays
> inhabitants of Murlo instead,
> assuming that Murlo's inhabitants might share as
> **much** as possible with **true** Etruscans.
> Quite obviously this assumption is wrong.
> The map resulting from their work looks like a map
> of Greek-speaking Jews in the Roman Empire circa the
> year 300 AD.
> It has nothing to do with Etruscans.
> ===================
> ****GK:
> where is your evidence that there were no
> Etruscan-speakers in these areas 2,000+ years ago?
>
> =====
> Arnaud
> I think Etruscans are inhabitants of Etruria
> Why should I have to prove they were **NOT**
> inhabitants of somewhere **Else** ?
> Your question does not make sense at all, from the
> start.
> Do I have to prove Gaulish people NEVER inhabited
> Patagonia ?
> If you have nothing serious to prove your point,
> just acknowledge you are wrong and that's it.
> Your failure to provide scientific solid
> documentation just means your theory bubbles down to
> nothing at all.
> The burden of proving Etruscans might come from
> somewhere else lies on those who think they might.
> I have nothing to prove in the first place.
> They were there. Full stop.
> Needs nothing else but be stated.
> Arnaud
> =============
>
>
>
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.____________________________________________________________________________________
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>