From: etherman23
Message: 50834
Date: 2007-12-10
>I've never understood identifying H3 with xW. If w, kW, gW, and gWH
> That's probably backwards; since p > f > xW etc., it's much more
> likely kWo- > xWo- optionally (in both Celtic and Arm.) and kWr. >
> xWr. > xWor > (h)or in Arm. There's no reason for r.>or after p, but
> xWr. > xWor was reg in Arm. and Greek (since H3 = xW).