From: meska_jd
Message: 50781
Date: 2007-12-09
>Slavic
> Glad to meet you, Roman,
>
> Your question is not clear.
> Lost Celtic *p is not enigmatic
> *p > *F > *h > *0
> What do you mean ?
>
> Arnaud
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: meska_jd
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 9:28 PM
> Subject: [Courrier indésirable] [tied] IE *p and *b
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am new one to this group. My background - Lithuanian and
> languages, at the moment I study Irish.this
>
> I have a questio re original *p and *b in IE. Somewhere around
> list people mentioned *b was rare (or non-existant) because ithas
> fallen with *w. This made me thinking - is it possible that *pwas a
> voiceless pair thereof, .i. [f] or bilabial [F] (phita sign ofGreek
> alphabet)? This would explain why *p was lost in Celtic - ratherany
> enigmatic phenomenon. The problem remain how to interpret *bh -
> ideas on that?
>
> Best regards,
> Róman
>