From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 50426
Date: 2007-10-23
>Alien sounds aren't always rendered consistently - cf. Lakota v.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Wordingham
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:12 PM
> Subject: [Courrier indésirable] [tied] Re: "As"
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@>
> wrote:
>
> > Pt 2 :
> > As regards YueZhi :
> > another name is RouZhi < *njaw- instead of *ngjaw.
>
> Now, Tocharian does have initial /ñ/, and in inherited words to boot:
> Tocharian A and B _ñu_ 'nine' and A _ñom_ B _ñem_ 'name'.
>
> ===============
>
> A.F
>
> What would njawtsix mean in Tokharian ?
>
> And how do you explain that ngjawtsix also exists ?
> ===========FWIW = For what it's worth.
> R.W.
> FWIW, there's a Proto-Tibetan-Burmese reconstruction *g-nis for 'two',
> and the Chinese reflexes include platal and velar nasals.
>Mark Rosenfelder gives Wu (Wenzhou) _ng 32_, Cantonese (Toishan) _ngei
> ==============
>
> A.F
>
> I know Chinese reflexes to be palatal ny or plain nasal n.
>
> Which dialects are velar !?
>
> Please substantiate "include velar nasals". (Plural + velar)
> Comments: For early OC a reconstruction *nit-s is also possible.Viet. has an interesting opposition: nhiÌ£ 'two' - nhiÌ 'second' - the
> Tocharianreconstruction starting with k-n ?
> does have words in kn-, e.g. _kna:_ 'know'.
>
> =============
>
> A.F
>
> Admittedly it makes sense, Do you have a Proto-Tibetan-Burmese
> You gave (possible) examples of gn-, what about k-n !?No. Proto-TB roots do not begin with /gn/ or /kn/ - the /g-/ is a