Re: [tied] Re: Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 50173
Date: 2007-09-30

 
----- Original Message -----
From: tgpedersen
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: [Courrier indésirable] [tied] Re: Renfrew's theory renamed as Vasco-Caucasian

> > 3.
> > > If you take the 100 word list as a base for a rough datation,
> > > FRench versus Italian : 79 %
> > > English versus German : 72 %
> > > French against English/German : 34 or 35 %.
> >
> > ============ ========
>
> A.F :
>
> I give you the table to convert % into time, with different rates:

> 2000 100% (slower) (slower)
> 1000 88,7% 90,5% 91,4
> 0 79 % 82 % 84 %
> -1000 70 % 74 % 76 %
> -2000 62 % 67 % 70 %
> -3000 55 % 61 % 64 %
> -4000 49 % 55 % 58 %
>
> (...)
>
> -10 000 24% 30% 34%

1) Where is that from?

============

A.F :

The numbers in the first colums are : years

The next column is a first erosion rate : 88,7% : 79% : etc

The next column is a slower erosion rate with a higher retention,

The next column is an erosion rate again slower

 

===============

2) French split from Italian appr. 1000 BCE?

============

A.F

If you take the fastest rate of erosion (second column from left)

79% hence separated around AD 00

72% hence separated around BC -1000

You seem to be a deep "delicatesse" with maths.

===============
 



Torsten