From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 50109
Date: 2007-09-29
----- Original Message -----From: stlatosSent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:31 AMSubject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: [tied] Latin m>w, w>m--- In cybalist@... s.com, Sean Whalen <stlatos@... > wrote:
> wegWof ..... mlixwos ... pYloudhom
> >
> wegWos ..... mli:wos ... plouthom
> wogWos ..... mli:wos ... plouthom
> wowos ...... mli:wos ... plouthom
> wowos ...... wli:wos ... plouthom
> wuwos ...... wli:wos ... plouthom
> u:wos ...... wli:wos ... plouthom
> u:wos ...... wli:wos ... plouTom
> u:wos ...... wli:wos ... ploufom
> u:wos ...... wli:wos ... plouvom
> u:wos ...... wli:wos ... ploubom
> u:wos ...... wli:wos ... plombom
> u:mos ...... wli:wos ... plombom
> u:mos ...... li:wos .... plombom
Also w > m after ru:
*dakYru 'tear'
*dakYrwax > *dakY-u-wax 'tears'
*dakY-u-wax ana> *dakY-ru-wax > dacruma
And in Germanic:
*druwo+ 'wooden, hard, strong, steady'
*truma+ > OE trum