Re: [tied] PIE *&>u?

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 49865
Date: 2007-09-08

On 2007-09-08 12:18, Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:

> OK, I suggested
> *tl.h2-tlah2 > *tl.tHlah2 > *t&tlah2

Sorry. *t&tHlah2 (in case anyone finds the form puzzling because of the
typo).

Piotr

Previous in thread: 49864
Next in thread: 49866
Previous message: 49864
Next message: 49866