From: stlatos
Message: 49393
Date: 2007-07-10
>I think this is too complicated. If there was fusion it was
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
>
> > *frawarðiða- ðeðe: > *frawarðiðe: (Goth. frawardida) by haplology
> > *frawarðiða- ðe:ðun > *frawarðiðe:ðun (Goth. frawardide:dun)
>
> It's even better: it's
>
> *frawarðiða- ðiðe: > *frawarðiðe:
> *frawarðiða- ðe:ðun > *frawarðiðe:ðun
>
> with /e:/ replacing only IE *e, not IE *i.
>
> The short /e/ of OS deda, OHG teta is from *i by a-umlaut which is
> apparently later than the replacement of /e/ by /e:/ in the
> reduplication. Thus Gmc. *ðiðe:, *ðe:ðun presupposes *ðiðe:, *ðeðun
> from IE *dhi-dhéH1-t, *dhé-dhH1-n.t .