From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 49223
Date: 2007-07-01
>I. Thanks Brian I only copied pishyakan from that site
> At 2:47:37 PM on Saturday, June 30, 2007, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Joao S. Lopes"
> > <josimo70@> wrote:
>
> >> They are mainly onomatopoeic. Not sure as PIE roots. And
> >> if there was a PIE root for "cat", it would refer to the
> >> wild cat, not the domestic one, that came to Europe
> >> through North Africa (Latin cattus<North African).
>
> > Onomatopoeic yes, but old too...
>
> > Why you make reference only to Latin here, talking about PIE?
>
> > Gaelic : pishyakan
>
> This is obvious nonsense: <pishyakan> is impossible in
> Gaelic orthography. There is a <piseag> 'kitten, young
> cat', nom. pl. <piseigean>; according to MacBain, it's a
> borrowing of English <pussy>.
>
> [...]
>
> Brian
>