From: stlatos
Message: 49039
Date: 2007-06-17
> For <pa:la> as well as <pa:lum ~ -s> 'stake, IIf you think this goes back to PIE, I have to disagree. There is
> propose *pag(^)-tlo- >
> *pakþlo > *pakslo- > *pa(g)zlo- > pa:lo-,
> I'm making no assumptions about the phonetic
> interpretation of *þ in the
> intermediate reconstruction above: it's just the
> same treatment as in
> the well-known "thorny" words, possibly with a
> [ts]-type affricate
> rather than a special fricative.