Re: [tied] Jetzt

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 49025
Date: 2007-06-16

On 2007-06-16 18:06, Andrew Jarrette wrote:

> newaere/niwa:ri = "nicht waere" = "would not be"? How does that meaning
> evolve into "only, merely, just"? And why does /nur/ have a high back
> vowel, not e.g. /"nehr"/ which might be more expected from *newaere?

No need to asterisk <newære>; it's attested. MHG has the complete
spectrum of intermediate forms, from <newære> via <newâr ~ niwâr ~ neuer
~ niwer ~ nuwer ~ nuer ~ neur ~ niur ~ nuor ~ ...> to <nûr>. The
semantic development is less odd that it might seem, as the preterite
subj. <wære> was often used in expressions indicating exclusion or
exception, more or less like "I have no friends, were (it) not (for)
John", in which "were not" (with phonetic contraction) could be
reinterpreted as "only".

Piotr

Previous in thread: 49024
Next in thread: 49027
Previous message: 49024
Next message: 49026

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts