Re: [tied] tt/st/ss

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Sean Whalen <stlatos@...> wrote:

> The loss of *x() between syllables
> creates complications that allow the differing order
> of non-PIE rules to be seen. PIE T+T stops >
> geminates in Sanskrit; after some X>0 the non-gem.
> d(h)+T combos undergo the sweeping areal fric.
> changes. I recently said:

The Indic d>z change also occurs after the loss of a V (due to dissim.):

dheigh+ 'smear'

dhidhighz.e+
didhighz.e+
didighz.e+
didghz.e+
dizghz.e+
di:ghz.e+
etc.
dhi:ks.ate