From: Sean Whalen
Message: 48803
Date: 2007-05-30
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos"Because t>s before a stop is a wide-ranging change.
> <stlatos@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen"
> <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> > > The problem is that Celtic, Germanic, Italic all
> have -d + t-, dh
> > > + t-, -t + t- > -ss- (OIr. fess, fiss
> knowledge), not -st-
> > the order was probably tt>st>ts>ss.
>
> The order of? Why 'probably'?
> +voice before nasal is a more wide-ranging changethan tn > nd, so it makes sense for that to be
> > Some words didn't have metathesis,I said "ts>ss", so it's never attested (though maybe
>
> Please mention a ppp in -ts- of a root in -d, -dh,
> -t.
> > or the order was restored at some morphemeAs I recently said:
> boundaries.
>
> Example?
>Probably also *vreit+ 'bend forward, roll',
> --- Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> > There
> > are only reflexes of *xarsta- 'wickerwork, grid'
> and
> > *xursti- 'wood,
> > shrubbery' (OE hyrst derives from the latter).
> They
> > are probably related
> > to each other, in which case they should both be
> > assigned to the root
> > *kert- 'turn, weave', and analysed as *kort-to-
> and
> > *kr.t-ti-.
>
> I think it's more likely that ke>ka, as in
> *k(a)rttis 'bent thing > wicker, brush?'
>
> So, to Latin:
>
> *karttis > *kar_tis> *kra_tis > cra:tis