From: Piotr Gąsiorowski
Message: 48627
Date: 2007-05-17
> This 'Genitive form - argument -' invoked 'by some' is a fake:? As if we knew nothing about ablaut in the IE declension of u-stems.
> 1. first the fact that we have an 'ablauting type a noun' is only a
> supposition => that need to be demonstrated first and not to be
> supposed as a Fact.
> 2. *perkW-ew-es CANNOT gave Latin quercus => there is no -kWewes > -What I'm saying is that the original declension involved *perkWu- (in
> cus in Latin
>
> Based on what Latin quercus is not *kWerkWus?
> You need to prove that Querquetani is really a Proto-Celtic word.Why should it not be Celtic if it makes sense in Celtic terms?
> More sure with toponyms but when we arrive to tribal names : is
> difficult to prove fr0om whta Language that word appears
> The fact that Quequetani is a Celtic name is usually refuted...By whom, and where is it refuted? (and why "usually"??).
> based onThe Germanic may have the same morphological structure as Hercynia, but
> *perkunyo where we have a Gothic loan starting with f- indicated for
> sure an initial p-