From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 48452
Date: 2007-05-05
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:No. The TA form is <s.äk> (the ordinal is likewise TB s.kaste, TA
>
>> (note the /s./ in TB s.pane, TZ s.päm.). TB sänme- therefore points to
>> *s&mnë- < *supno-,
>
> But isn't there *swekYs > *s.&ks / *s.k&s > TA säk; TB s.kas which
> shows that s.>s (apparently before some vowels, though the order and
> exact rules are uncertain)?