Latin m>w, w>m

From: Sean Whalen
Message: 47997
Date: 2007-03-20

Some of the unusual rules I've proposed in the last
few months seemed uncertain to me, but I've become
more confident in them as I gathered additional
evidence. Some of the changes are very similar to
others that I think explain problems in related
languages.

Here's one group:

Rules:

e>o / w_gW
gW>w / V_V
gW>w / V_N
m>w / #_l
o>u / w_w
wu>u: / _w
w>m / o_b
w>m / u:_V [-front?, optional?]
w>0 / #_R

wegWxY,dos ... mlixwos ... pYloudhom
>
wegWados ..... mli:wos ... plouthom
wogWados ..... mli:wos ... plouthom
wowados ...... mli:wos ... plouthom
wowados ...... wli:wos ... plouthom
wuwados ...... wli:wos ... plouthom
u:wados ...... wli:wos ... plouthom
u:wados ...... wli:wos ... plouTom
u:wados ...... wli:wos ... ploufom
u:wados ...... wli:wos ... plouvom
u:wados ...... wli:wos ... ploubom
u:wados ...... wli:wos ... plombom
u:mados ...... wli:wos ... plombom
u:mados ...... li:wos .... plombom

wegW+ 'be wet' > Grk ugrós
wegWxY,dos > Lat u:vidus / u:midus 'wet'

me-lix-wos mli-xw(e)+ / me-li-xwos mlix-w(e)+
'dirty colored (black, purple, blue, etc.)' >
Grk mólibos 'lead', Lat li:vidus 'black and blue'

pYloudhom 'lead' > Lat plumbum
pYloudhyos 'made of lead' > MIr luaide 'lead'





____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091