From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 47979
Date: 2007-03-19
>Sorry for my English: please read 'you didn't understand'
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> >
> > On 2007-03-19 21:40, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> >
> > > I need to put a third question, Only to really be more clear :
> > >
> > > Question-3)
> > > - we have a long a: in two Latin Nom. forms : /na:ris/
> and /sa:l/
> > > BUT
> > > - in the accusatives forms: for one we have a short-a /salem/
> when
> > > the other has a long-a /na:rem/
> > > You need a model to explain this difference...
> >
> > Let me think... Perhaps the same model that accounts for the
> following
> > alternations?
> >
> > nom.sg. *pó:d-s, acc.sg. *pód-m.
> > nom.sg. *népo:t-s, acc.sg. *népot-m.
> > nom.sg. *pré:k^-s, acc.sg. *prék^-m.
> > nom.sg. *p&2té:r, acc.sg. *p&2tér-m.
> >
> > Piotr
> >
>
>
> You didn't undertood my question:
>
> Why long-a in Latin Acc. na:rem ? All your accusative forms quoted
> above have a SHORT-a.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>