Re: [tied] PIE *HRHV > Pre-Latin HRVH > Latin RV: (*h1rh1-om-eh2 >

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2007-03-19 21:40, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > I need to put a third question, Only to really be more clear :
> >
> > Question-3)
> > - we have a long a: in two Latin Nom. forms : /na:ris/

and /sa:l/

> > BUT
> > - in the accusatives forms: for one we have a short-a /salem/

when

> > the other has a long-a /na:rem/
> > You need a model to explain this difference...
>
> Let me think... Perhaps the same model that accounts for the

following

> alternations?
>
> nom.sg. *pó:d-s, acc.sg. *pód-m.
> nom.sg. *népo:t-s, acc.sg. *népot-m.
> nom.sg. *pré:k^-s, acc.sg. *prék^-m.
> nom.sg. *p&2té:r, acc.sg. *p&2tér-m.
>
> Piotr
>

You didn't undertood my question:

Why long-a in Latin Acc. na:rem ? All your accusative forms quoted
above have a SHORT-a.

Thanks,
Marius