--- Sean Whalen <
stlatos@...> wrote:
>
> --- Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:
>
> > re *kón-x-mós *knx-m(e)+ > OE hamm, Gk kné:me:
> > Can we relate this to English haunch from Germanic
> > hanka or vel sim?
>
> As far as I can tell they're not directly related.
Now that I have an explanation for cranoc; the fact
that both examples of *x-k have k>g>k makes it likely
that when x, > G, a following k > g. So conch and
haunch are ultimately related (based on bent shape and
small size).
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091