Re: Res: [tied] Etymology of Rome - h1rh1-em-/h1rh1-o:m-

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:35:30 +0100, Piotr Gasiorowski
<gpiotr@...> wrote:

>On 2007-03-14 22:11, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal wrote:
>
>> What about Greek *h1rh1-yó: > *&1r&1yó: > eréo: (LIV, p.
>> 251)? (and, as I mentioned a couple of weeks ago *h1nh3-m()n
>>> enoma/onoma).
>
>Isn't this an inner Greek problem of the relative chronology of
>laryngeal vs. syllabic resonant vocalisation in various positions? My
>remark referred to the PIE situation, not to any of the branches.

Well, that was my question: the Greek forms behave as if
derived from H.RH.(C) instead of HR.H(C). Can this be fixed
by assuming an inner-Greek "syllabification reversal" (HR.H

> H.RH.), or does it mean that we should leave the PIE

reconstruction at *HRH?

What does HRHV give in Greek?

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
miguelc@...