Re: [tied] kom, som

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:42:40 -0000, "Pavel A. da Mek"
<a.da_mek0@...> wrote:

>Why are Latin com- "together" and Slavic soM- "together" considered as
>unrelated?
>What would be wrong with reconstructing *k^om "together",
>unrelated with *som "equal"?

Nothing. It's just that Lith. has saN- (< *som-), not *s^aN-
(*k^om-).

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
miguelc@...