From: tgpedersen
Message: 47415
Date: 2007-02-11
>No, before you try to read what I actually wrote, I don't need to make
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "mkelkar2003" <swatimkelkar@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > The horsemen in Europe are there in the
> > > > > > archaeological record, general death and destruction.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Death and destruction? Please do not tell me we are back to the
> > > > > barberic nomadic Aryan hordes destroying the dark skinned
> > > > > inhabitants of the "Indus" valley civilzation aka the Aryan
> > > > > Invasion Theory. Your Sankritist colleagues over on
> > > > > Indo-Eurasian have done every thing possible to deny that they
> > > > > support such violent conquest. Now they are talking about
> > > > > Indo-Aryan peaceful migrations or trickle ins.
> > > >
> > > > I repeat:
> > > > The horsemen in Europe are there in the archaeological record,
> > > > general death and destruction.
> > > >
> > > > Now try to read it properly this time.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Torsten
> > >
> > > So these violent horsemen of Europe brought the "Indo-Aryan"
> > > languges riding chariots to South Asia. " Aka the blond aryan
> > > superman butchering the dark skineed dasas of the Rig Veda.
> >
> > No, that was the British invasion. Apparently that image is stuck
> > in your head for some reason. And you still got it wrong, and in
> > the same way as last time. Therefore
> >
> > I repeat:
> > The horsemen in Europe are there in the archaeological record,
> > general death and destruction.
> >
> > Now try to read it properly this time.
> >
>
> You first need to make up your mind which theory you support. It the
> mounted warrior or agriculture?