From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 47371
Date: 2007-02-10
>--- Miguel Carrasquer Vidal <miguelc@...> wrote:No. Analogy means that a feature of A is transferred to B,
>
>> Apart from a relatively small number of i- and
>> u-stems with
>> a divergent paradigm (genitive sg. in -jés/-jós,
>> -wés/-wós),
>> some of which may be old n-stems (e.g. the u-stem
>> neuters
>> *doru(r), *g^onu(r), *pok^u(r) ~ *pek^u(r),
>> *medhu(r) ,
>> etc.,
>
> If these are given (r) because of the Armenian forms
>I'd disagree. Final *-s just goes through changes due
>to retroflex (after K/r/u/s):
>us
>us.
>uz.
>ur.
>ur
>r
>
> There is simply analogy at some time changing the
>neuter to the same as the non;
> I searched the archives and found this earlierOf course. This applies only in monosyllables: *tris > erir
>discussion. Do you still believe this? Is there any
>need to attribute the Armenian forms to an otherwise
>unseen peculiarity of PIE?
>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer
><mcv@...> wrote:
>>
>> Olsen has shown that *-is and *-us
>> in final position (when there was no early loss of
>> the vowel) give -r (presumably -(i/u)s^ > -z^ > -r).