Re: [tied] Daimo:n 'Divider' <-> Bog 'Divider' too?

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2007-01-16 12:58, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > 1. If from Iranian, how many Iranians loans we have in Slavic
> > reflecting Slavic o < Iranian a ? Could you write a short list

please?

>
> It's the regular reflex (Slavic *o represents the merger of old *o

and *a).

>

I know, of course, this transformation. I have asked for similar
examples of such Iranians loans in Slavic reflecting Iranian a >
Slavic o (=>so loans older than sec V-VI max. : Sl. a > Sl. o)

> > 2. We have also
> > Tocharian B pa:ke, Tocharian A pa:k
>
> Also probably a loan from Middle Iranian.

So again we would deal here with a loan earlier than g > k in
Tocharian too...Do you know other Iranians loans in Tocharian
reflecting Iranian g > Tocharian k?

> > 3.If no h2 in the root, how you will explain the variants with

long

> > vowel /a:/ in the root : see Skt. ba:gá
>
> You mean <bHa:gá-> 'part, portion', don't you? It's the same

pattern as

> in <bHára-> vs. <bHa:rá-> 'burden, load' from *bHer- (no laryngeal

here!).

>
> Piotr
>

Yes. Thanks for the other example.
But maybe laryngeal on one side and no laryngeal on the other? Where
would be the contradiction?


Marius