From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 46835
Date: 2006-12-30
> So, if I understand you right, PIE hasYes.
>
> 1)
> a) athematic nouns with mobile stress,
> b) thematic nouns with fixed stress on rootYes.
> c) thematic nouns with fixed stress on thematic vowelYes.
>I don't think so. It had _athematic_ verbs with mobile stress (plus some
> and
>
> 2)
> a) semithematic present verb stems with mobile stress,
> b) thematic present verb stems with fixed stress on rootThese are probably post-PIE.
> c) thematic present verb stem with fixed stress on thematic vowelYes.
> andOther people call them athematic.
>
> 3)
> a) semithematic aorist verb stems with mobile stress,
> b) thematic aorist verb stems with fixed stress on rootNo.
> c) thematic aorist verb stem with fixed stress on thematic vowelHe would have said, "Respect the evidence".
> but in 3b) none of the thematic aorist verb stems with fixed stress on
> root have matching cognates in other languages. 3b) can not be shown
> to exist and therefore it does not exist. Therefore 3) is not similar
> to 2) and 2) + 3) not similar to 1).
>
> What do you think Popper would say?