Re: Slavic endings

From: tgpedersen
Message: 46010
Date: 2006-09-10

> Novgorod/Pskov Slavic differed from the bulk of Slavic in having
> frequent sequences of velars followed by front vowels because it
> (Novgorod/Pskov Slavic) had not carried through the Second Regressive
> Palatalization, so you had Lsg zamUke^ 'lock' where normal Slavic had
> zamUce^.

This is not ex-Fennic Slavic-learners creolically regularizing a
confusing (to them) paradigm?


Torsten

Previous in thread: 46009
Next in thread: 46011
Previous message: 46009
Next message: 46011

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts