From: tgpedersen
Message: 45995
Date: 2006-09-06
>Bomhard: Indo-European and the Nostratic hypothesis
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> > > How about Gk. kámpto: 'bend', Lith. kam~pas 'corner', Goth.
> > > hamfs 'mutilated'?
> > I was talking only about "true" dipthongs, i.e. *ai and *au, not
> > combinations with nasals and liquids.
>
> EIEC's *kaunos (Gk.(Hes.) kaunós 'bad, evil', Goth. hauns 'humble',
> Latv. kàuns 'shame, disgrace', if belongs here, Lith. placename
> Kau~nas).
>
> Sl. lê^vU (c), Gk. laiós -- no Hirt, therefore, according to your
> formulation if Hirt's Law, no *a:i.
> Possibly EIEC's *mai- (Goth. G. pl. maile 'wrinkle', OE ma:l 'spot',
> Lith. pl. mie~le:s, Latv. mìeles 'yiest'), if Gk. miaíno: 'stain,
> sully' belongs here).
> Probably Lat. paucus 'little', Gk. paûros 'little', if Lith.Also in Semitic. Loan?
> pau~ks^tis 'bird' belongs here (for the semantic development cf. the
> etymology of Sl. pUti"ca).
>
> Lat. scaevus, Gk. skaiós, Lith. kai~ras (4) 'left'.
>
> Lat. taurus, Gk. taûros 'bull', Lith. tau~ras 'aurochs', Sl. tûrU (c).