From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 45982
Date: 2006-09-06
> Then, how does the assumption of "dominant root acute" exclude thesaying
> existence of pre-Dybo barytones with post-tonic acutes? All I was
> was that _if_ the root contains a sufficiently old acute vowel itthrough
> receives stress at the expense of an acuted derivational suffix
> a kind of "long retraction".But you didn't mention this "the root" qualificator:
>My feeling is that it's a very old principle: acutes attract stress,so that I thought you mean any acutes, first of which gains the stress.
>and
>if there's a conflict between two acutes, the first one wins,