From: Sean Whalen
Message: 45860
Date: 2006-08-28
> On 2006-08-27 20:48, Sean Whalen wrote:I'm sure the metathesis happened in PIE, or at least
>
> > All of that is wrong. I don't want to get on
> > another tangent so I'll say: I already said there
> was
> > metathesis in 'sun', if you don't believe *sxulyos
> > existed then just assume *suxlyos > *su:lyas and a
> new
> > adj. was formed *su:lna- with delengthening in
> that
> > environment.
>
> I could accept the development of *h2u > u: in an
> open syllable in
> Indo-Iranian (presumably via laryngeal metathesis),
> so that *sh2ul-ijo-*sxulyos was the gen. of *saxwel; forming an adj. from
> > Skt. su:rya-. But I can't accept the gymnastics
> that follow
> (analogical *su:lna- in a language that has no
> reflex of *su:lijo-
> justWhat am I doing that's so unusual? The derivation
> to force the point about the otherwise unattested
> difference between
> inherited *ul and syllabic *l. in Proto-Germanic,
> resulting in two
> different and differently assimilated lateral
> phonemes). I'm afraid we
> live in different solar systems ;-).
> nn instead of usual *ln>ll. Since I already hadl>L as an intermediate stage in some Ger. derivations