Re: [tied] Re: Semantic differentiation between thematic and athema

> > It is a strange fact that the manifestly secondary
> tudáti type is
> > present in Hittite (suwe-zzi 'pushes' = Ved.
> suvá-ti 'pushes'),
> > while the much better secured type of bhárati,
> ájati etc. is not
> > found at all.

Accented e/o remain, other e/o deleted so originally
thematic verbs look athematic in Hittite.

Neither form is secondary; they're both original and
meant different things right from the start.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com