From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 45137
Date: 2006-06-26
>--- Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:What there is in Armenian is a marked tendency to favour the
>
>> No, I'm saying there is no o > a in Armenian.
> What aboutG. *&3kW-mn.(t)-ós (= Grk. ómmatos) => *ak`mánoh > akan
>
>akn vs oculus L
>ayn vs oino-/e:- GkNot sure what the connection is supposed to be. The Arm.
>aytnum vs oidos- GkGreek oideo: has o-grade (causative-iterative), and oi~dos
>atamn vs odont- GkZero grade *&1dn.(t)-mn.t-ós > atamán (G). Cf. Olsen 505.
>ateam vs odium, o:di: LZero-grade *&3d- plus stressed formative -eám.
>garun vs vasara Lith (o>a in Lith)*wesr > ge(h)ar > gar + -onto- > -un. Olsen 41.
> I suppose you also would have to say h2 and h3 merge*&1noh3mn > anu(w)n (/m/ > /w/ before or after /o:/, Olsen
>before h2>a. It's possible by itself, but makes some
>changes strange (assimilation in enuma-/onuma- can't
>account for anun).
>Do you have any cases of a>o later (and e>o)?Alleged cases of e > a are, amongst others:
>How do you derive k'ayr from *swesor- (anyStraightforward: sweso:r > k`e(h)ur > k`oyr (with the normal
>analogy)?